Dear Bishops, Convince Me.

Bishop Coyner of Indiana has proposed an idea to help save the United Methodist church from an all-out schism which essentially boils down to creating a whole host of denominations based on annual conferences (geography) while we still call ourselves The United Methodist Church.

You can read about it HERE and decide for yourself whether this is a good idea or not.   I’m not convinced and have to wonder, why bother?  Why bother remaining “united” when this is not the biblical notion of “united” by any stretch of the imagination?   To be “united” in the same sense Jesus prayed we would be united is to be of “one mind” on matters of gospel truth.   We are to be united in spirit and truth.   That is what sets us apart from the world.  Being sanctified in God’s truth, which is God’s word (John 17:17) means to be set apart from all other words.  It is in large part our set-apart-ness, our holiness, our distinction from the evil one in this world (John 17:15) which unites us.  But we are anything but united in that way.

Unity in the eyes of Jesus has nothing to do with our shared buildings, pensions, properties, health insurance or logo.  

I wish our bishops would lead us.   To Bishop Coyner and others who are presenting ideas about how to hold us together as a denomination, here are my 2-cents, offered humbly as a candidate recommended for provisional membership this year in Holston’s Annual Conference:

Whatever idea you present, try to convince me by appealing to my sense of call. Convince me that by staying together as the United Methodist Church we will better be able to reach the lost and introduce people to the saving work of Jesus Christ and enable them to grow in holiness. Convince me that by staying together I can better carry out my calling to save souls and see lives transformed by the gospel of Jesus Christ.  Convince me that my witness to the Gospel – which is a call for all people everywhere to repent and believe in the one name under heaven by which humankind can be saved – will be better served as a United Methodist than as anything else.   Convince me that our mission to make disciples for Jesus Christ includes repentance and a heart strangely-warmed and teaching people to follow the commands of our Lord.  

But bishops, if the only carrot you can dangle before me is my pension and property and health insurance, or even the invitation to “transform the world”, then I’m sorry.  That does not appeal to my sense of call, and, I imagine, the sense of call many others share.   Do better.  I’m open to being convinced that we are still the church that believes God changes hearts and lives, interested in spreading scriptural holiness throughout the land.  Convince me that we can do it better together than apart.  Convince me. 

Image

 

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Dear Bishops, Convince Me.

    • Talbot and Chad –

      Connectional ministry is part of what it means to be United Methodist. And that’s known up front. If you need convincing on its merits over congregationalism at this point, you might want to consider a new tradition altogether.

      • Ben, the teaching that homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching is also known up front, and more than being just part of Methodism, it’s been part of the Christian call to holiness from the beginning. Rather than divide a church over that issue, wouldn’t it be better for those who disagree with the church’s teaching to find a new tradition altogether?

        Besides, it’s Bishop Coyner’s proposal which more or less obliterates our connectional way of life, which is what I took Talbot’s comment to mean.

  1. Chad, excellent article! Prepare to get pounded by the Conference Board of Ordained Ministry! Randy Little

    >________________________________ > From: umc holiness >To: rancol_little@yahoo.com >Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 8:59 AM >Subject: [New post] Dear Bishops, Convince Me. > > > > WordPress.com >Chad Holtz posted: “Bishop Coyner of Indiana has proposed an idea to help save the United Methodist church from an all-out schism which essentially boils down to creating a whole host of denominations based on annual conferences (geography) while we still call ourselves The ” >

  2. Pedantic note: the “United” in the name “United Methodist Church” is a reference to the Evangelical United Brethren denomination, with which the Methodist Church merged in 1968. Theologically, the UMC has not been especially “united” either before or after that date.

  3. Regardless of the historical provenance of “United,” it’s a proxy (and shibboleth) for the unity that eludes us. Do sprawling, fractious, corrupted and rotting denominations ever experience holy renewal?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s